Critical Reasoning Question:

Download Job Interview Questions and Answers PDF

Hacking is a crime made possible by a relatively new technology, which one of the reasons it is often poorly understood and reported. Many computers, but no means all, are now linked together in networks which allow users on one computer to communicate with others on the same network. If a computer is not networked, no manipulation of its data from another machine is possible. So long as users are authorized, networking is just a way of making work easier and more productive. Hacking on the other hand, is the unauthorized use of networks or unauthorized entity into the computers themselves. Most people do not need to break into the networks they use, since they are already accredited users?

Answer:

Most hackers are authorized to break into networks (True/False/Can't say)
Computers are only vulnerable to the unauthorized manipulation of their data via another computer if they are networked (True/False/Can't say)
The main reason why it is relatively easy to break into a computer is that few people understand the technology. (True/False/Can't say)
Hackers do not work for the firms whose networks they break into. (True/False/Can't say)

False
False
True
False

Download Critical Reasoning Interview Questions And Answers PDF

Previous Question

Next Question

Although invaders represent a threat to the conservation of flora and fauna, there are two special cases in which invasion have been deliberately brought about. One is the desire to control presents by natural predators, which may have to be brought in from other countries. The second is releasing organisms into the wild(or on to farms, from which they might escape)that are completely novel, because they have been genetically engineered. There is nothing intrinsically sinister about engineered organisms, but any novelty must be regarded as a potential invader?

Words in totalitarian systems have an unhealthy importance and in such states now attempting to return to a more democratic normality there has been a natural inevitable and healthy devaluation of words whereas previously a single word used in a speech or even a play or poem could be a serious political event now the words come cheaper almost free. Politics is politics again and poetry only poetry?